when may police officers seize contraband during a lawful pat-down terry stop?

Specifically, the decision held that a police officer does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to 'stop and frisk' a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.

Warren, joined by Black, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas, Marshall Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed.Ĭhief Justice Earl Warren Associate Justices Hugo Black Police may stop a person if they have a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime, and may frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed and dangerous, without violating the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures. 1966) review denied, Ohio Supreme Court, Novemcert. 321 ( Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County 1964) affirmed, 214 N.E.2d 114 ( Ohio Ct.

2d 489 (1964) defendant convicted, 95 Ohio L. 2d 383ĭefendant's motion to suppress evidence denied, 32 Ohio Op.

When may police officers seize contraband during a lawful pat-down terry stop?